Modeling User Arguments, Interactions, and Attributes for Stance Prediction in Online Debate Forums Supplementary Document
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose an integrated model to jointly model user arguments, interactions and attributes for the task of stance prediction. The graphical representation of the model can be found in Figure 1. The model is composed of four parts: i.) user profiling, which considers a regression-based latent factorization method to incorporate user attributes for profiling users; ii.) user stance, which contains a binomial matrix factorization method for modeling categorical stance data; iii.) user arguments, which incorporate textual cues in threaded posts; and iv.) user interaction, which integrates the positive and negative interaction attributes between users.
منابع مشابه
Modeling User Arguments, Interactions, and Attributes for Stance Prediction in Online Debate Forums
Online debate forums are important social media for people to voice their opinions and debate with each other. Mining user stances or viewpoints from these forums has been a popular research topic. However, most current work does not address an important problem: for a specific issue, there may not be many users participating and expressing their opinions. Despite the sparsity of user stances, ...
متن کاملUTCNN: a Deep Learning Model of Stance Classification on Social Media Text
Most neural network models for document classification on social media focus on text information to the neglect of other information on these platforms. In this paper, we classify post stance on social media channels and develop UTCNN, a neural network model that incorporates user tastes, topic tastes, and user comments on posts. UTCNN not only works on social media texts, but also analyzes tex...
متن کاملUser Stance Prediction via Online Behavior Mining
Nowadays social media, such as Twitter and all kinds of online forums, becomes a platform where people can express their opinions implicitly or explicitly. For example, in Twitter, people follow people they trust, and retweet the tweets they agree. In online forums, such as PoliticalForum.com, people explicitly express their opinions and interact with each other using text. Our goal is to under...
متن کاملCombining Textual Entailment and Argumentation Theory for Supporting Online Debates Interactions
Blogs and forums are widely adopted by online communities to debate about various issues. However, a user that wants to cut in on a debate may experience some difficulties in extracting the current accepted positions, and can be discouraged from interacting through these applications. In our paper, we combine textual entailment with argumentation theory to automatically extract the arguments fr...
متن کاملJoint Models of Disagreement and Stance in Online Debate
Online debate forums present a valuable opportunity for the understanding and modeling of dialogue. To understand these debates, a key challenge is inferring the stances of the participants, all of which are interrelated and dependent. While collectively modeling users’ stances has been shown to be effective (Walker et al., 2012c; Hasan and Ng, 2013), there are many modeling decisions whose ram...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015